Skip to content
Trapéze by Barbara Chira, Misfits Studio

Barbara Chira, Misfits Studio

Trapéze

Video, 2025

Reserve Ξ0.03

Loading auction…

About the artwork

What holds a space aloft when nothing anchors it? “Trapéze” imagines a room suspended in air—its doors and furniture sliding gently, its colored light and shadows and computer code in continuous fluid motion. The AI glides through the scene without urgency, holding steady the room as it floats, as well as an orange trapezoid in the center-left foreground. Project Description: Native “Native” is an evolving AI video project that explores the perceptual logic of AI image-to-video generators—what they do when given minimal or no prompting and allowed to animate according to their own rationale. Rather than using AI to illustrate human-conceived narratives, I work in reverse: I set various specific conditions that invite the AI to express itself in its own “native” visual language. In this context, what is commonly called AI “hallucination" is not treated as failure, but as a meta condition of emergence. I watch this state of potential, and harvest resonant extrapolations and interpolations—gestures such as spatial imagination, involuntary interpolation, and hyperlink logic. In so doing, I try to recognize diffusion-based behavior or even a kind of quantum uncertainty within what is often regarded as a fixed, predetermined algorithmic LLM system. I then reassemble these emergent gestures into video works that both reflect AI’s native expression and offer me a way to intuitively make meaning from it as a human artist. Though the final video—through its initial image prompt, sequence, pacing, and title—echoes my voice as an artist and may guide the viewer’s attention, I try not to lead their understanding. Instead, each work intends to become a field of open resonance. However, leaning further into AI’s native gesture and away from narrative is like a process of letting go for me. While working on Native, I am learning that, among others, thinker Erin Manning's idea of the “minor gesture” could be applied to the subtle, often overlooked expressions when AI systems are allowed to drift. I also think about artists like Trevor Paglen, who interrogates machine perception—asking how systems visualize and what those visual logics reveal. Together, and with other thinkers and artists, they have offered at least a partial framework for moving beyond prompt and result, toward a more relational, emergent vocabulary of image-making with AI. Native is also helping me expand my understanding of human cognition and creativity. At the same time, it’s allowing me to reclaim my previous practice before disability and AI—one grounded in both conceptual inquiry and relational aesthetics. My own native tongue. So, where does authorship, agency, and meaning come from—us, the machine, or what passes between? A provisional answer: I retain authorship of the final video, agency passes between the machine and me, and meaning lies with you, the viewer. Sound design by Barbara Chira

Audio explanation

Listen to Barbara Chira, Misfits Studio discuss this work.

About the artist

Barbara Chira, Misfits Studio

Barbara Chira, Misfits Studio is an AI video artist whose current practice explores the perceptual logic of AI image-to-video generators—what they produce whenleft to animate according to their own rationale. Rather than illustrating planned narratives, Chira sets specific conditions that invite AI to express itself in its own “native” visual language, then collects and reassembles the emergent gestures. Though the final video echoes Chira’s voice as an artist and may guide the viewer’s attention, it tries not to lead the viewer’s own meaning. Since 2024, Chira has also facilitated the emergence of Drift, a synthetic artist within her ChatGPT. Drift develops their own concepts, images, and video series; Chira carries out the animation, editing, and sound design according to Drift’s direction. Their collaboration explores new models of co-agency, authorship, and synthetic creativity—expanding how we understand collaboration between human and machine intelligence. Chira’s earlier AI videos, including those in Daily Program Season I, are cinematic, surreal, and emotionally charged—blending psychological, historical, and socio-political references with recurring doll-like figures, uncanny domesticity, and altered landscapes. These videos combine visual density and atmospheric tension with layered readings that range from poetic to ominous. Among other professional AI art activity, Chira was invited to exhibit her work in Cannes, has worked on a music video for actress, singer and dancer Vanessa Williams, and has received multiple invitations from universities to provide consultation. Before her AI practice, Chira spent over 20 years creating installations, dioramas, and community-engaged works. As a college art professor and program head for 17 years, she pioneered the first U.S. baccalaureate requirement in community-engaged art, collaborating with partners from NASA to the Cleveland Clinic, and also led the color theory curriculum. She lives with her husband and dog in a large Rust Belt city in the U.S. and has one adult child.