(loop (format t "~%")) ;2 ^ int main(){for(;;);} //1

nouseskou.

(loop (format t "~%")) ;Osp6

"The distinction between subjective and objective perspectives undergoes a continuous process that culminates in a singular unification which is the artwork."

nouseskou

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibition Information


Date: Oct 17, 1:00 PM ET

Artworks: 12

Discuss: Discord Arrow Pointer


The Daily AI Video Program proposes a series of questions about AI video production. What is the basic grammar of this new medium? What similarities and differences exist with previous video art practices? How do synthetic aesthetics relate to digital video creation? What are the aesthetic precedents of these new algorithmic moving images? What are the commonalities between these different tools, and what new unique opportunities do they offer artists? Can artists use these tools to question authorship and the myth of human creativity? By asking these questions, we propose expanding our curatorial project to include creators who stand in the middle ground between contemporary video and new AI video art—a space that will help spawn some answers and new questions about AI video art and its future.
Nouseskou expands our curatorial explorations into AI video. In his work, he crafts unique visual intersections where technology and human expression converge. We find his work deeply embedded in the explorations of dance, the body as art, nature, and technology. His visual experiments share an underlying kinship with contemporary AI video art through the lens of innovation, memory, and the transformation of the familiar into the abstract.
Both Nouseskou's creations and AI video art thrive on the manipulation of imagery, distorting and reimagining figures and landscapes into new, often unrecognizable forms. This abstraction serves as a canvas for exploring deeper themes—memory, identity, dependence on technology, and the passage of time. It invites viewers to engage with the art as a proposition that technology can become a bridge between the tangible and the ethereal, between the artist's vision and the audience's perception.
We find that his work also embodies a dialogue with the past, drawing from his interactions with the serene natural landscapes of Kyoto and the dynamic realms of street and contemporary dance. The work is ultimately a manifestation of a palimpsest of ideas and experiences that echoes the way AI video art depends on referencing and reinterpreting past images. The convergence of Nouseskou's video artwork raises similar questions about the future trajectory of video creation that AI video presents to viewers and creators today. As technology becomes increasingly entwined with artistic expression, the boundaries between creator and creation blur, prompting a reevaluation of authorship and authenticity.
Artworks
The Artist

Subscribe